BannerL.gif Dolphins in Danger
idw logo

Environmental Pollution

"Without doubt the biggest threat to dolphins comes from man."

The indiscriminate dumping of chemical and other waste in our oceans means that many dolphin populations are subjected to a cocktail of toxic pollutants. The current plight of the dolphins and whales is an indicator of wider problems in the marine environment.

The dolphin die-off

In 1987 large numbers of dead bottlenose dolphins (in excess of 700) were washed up on the coast of New Jersey, in the eastern USA. The dolphins were covered in sores, and their skin had become detached over large areas of their bodies. It was concluded that the dolphin's immune system had been seriously damaged, and that consequently they had succumbed to a variety of pathogens. The question still remains as to the cause of this immunosuppression. The US Government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) declared that the cause was the ingestion of fish which contained toxins produced by a "red tide". A red tide is the result of extremely rapid growth of dinoflagellates, which are a type of plankton, resulting from extreme environmental factors (increased levels of certain fertilisers are known to contribute to such phenomena). They produce a toxin known as brevotoxin, and the NOAA declared that it was this substance entering the food chain that had caused the demise of the dolphins. However, it is widely held that the cause was in fact a high concentration of PCB's (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) which results from the dumping of waste of many different types. The level of PCB's in the dead dolphins ranged from 13 to 620 parts per million (ppm) with one yielding unprecedented levels of 6.800 ppm. Products which contain more than 5 ppm are required by law to be labelled toxic in the USA!
A Congressional Hearing into the disaster was told that attempts to suppress the significance of these toxic levels of PCB's had been made by Government officials.

For a comprehensive picture of ocean pollution by Greenpeace, Follow this link

Commercial Fishing

The modern fishing fleet harvests the seas indiscriminately. It does not distinguish between fish and marine mammals, and in it's quest for increased efficiency, slaughters thousands of dolphins each year drowned in nets. As the world's fish stocks become more depleted from over-fishing, there is a danger that man's pursuit of protein food will lead to a more determined capture of dolphins and whales to satisfy the demand.

Several fishing practices have taken a toll on dolphin populations. Most lethal are drift nets and nets called purse seines, used to fish for yellowfin tuna. Because tuna often swim beneath dolphin schools, dolphins are actively sought. Fishermen then circle the tuna with mile-long (1.6-km) seine nets that trap fish and mammals alike. When this practice started in the 1950s, it killed more than a quarter of a million dolphins a year. Now boat captains are trained to employ manoeuvres that help release the dolphins. The dolphin kill now totals around 20,000 a year.

The drift net, though, is the most indiscriminate killing device yet used at sea. Up to 40 miles (64 km) long, drift nets hang draped from floats, trapping virtually everything in their path. Fishermen haul the nets aboard, store the fish or squid, and discard everything else, including dolphins that have drowned while trapped.

More on the threat from over-fishing.

Captivity

The dolphin has evolved over a period in excess of 30 million years to be superbly adapted to it's environment. It is a highly streamlined and efficient swimmer, due to it's shape and the composition of it's skin which reduces friction to a minimum. It has a highly developed brain, and if we ignore the mass of blubber under it's skin, it is the only animal to have a greater brain mass/body weight ratio than man. The entertainment industry has been exploiting this adaptation for many years and held dolphins

After many years of protest from animal rights groups etc., the numbers of such facilities siver.jpgthroughout the world has been in decline, and the UK, with none at all, leads the world. There are, however, still many captive dolphins, and IDW will not rest until there are none. Those with a vested commercial interest would have us believe that the dolphins are content with their lot, but the majority accept that it is morally indefensible to contain an animal that normally roams freely throughout great stretches of the world's oceans in highly organised social groups.

Consider the following statements from the Captivity Fact Sheet (Dolphin Project Europe, 1996):

  • 53% of those dolphins who survive the violent capture die within 90 days.
  • The average life span of a dolphin in the wild is 45 years; yet half of all captured dolphins die within their first two years of captivity. The survivors last an average of only 5 years in captivity.
  • Every seven years, half of all dolphins in captivity die from capture shock, pneumonia, intestinal disease, ulcers, chlorine poisoning, and other stress-related illnesses. To the captive dolphin industry, these facts are accepted as routine operating expenses.

There is abundant material available on the Internet on this subject, and we do not intend to duplicate this material. One site the reader may wish to visit is WDCS (The Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society) which has much information on the current state of cetacean captivity and IDW are very supportive of their philosophy, aims and objectives. Another website concerned with captivity from a different viewpoint is Zalophus, and it must be stressed that the ideology expressed here is generally alien to IDW's, but the reader should draw his/her own conclusions.

It is unfortunate that dolphins appear to have a smile on their faces which is one of the features that people often refer to that makes them "cute". Unlike humans, dolphins have no facial muscles and therefore are incapable of changing their expression. However, try telling a child that the dolphins at a dolphinarium show are not happy. Try telling a child that when a dolphin splashes the water with it's tail, it is expressing anger and frustration, not joy like the family dog.

There are no captive dolphins in the United Kingdom. This has been achieved by educating people to the plight of captive dolphins, together with a total commitment by members of organisations like IDW who have campaigned relentlessly over many years. The situation is also improving in Europe due to similar efforts, but regrettably, this is not so in the USA, where powerful commercial organisations gain substantial revenue from "entertaining" with captive dolphins. Their publicity machines even strive to convince people that they are engaged in valuable research aimed ultimately at improving the dolphin's lot. Don't be fooled.

HAPPY DOLPHINS ARE FREE DOLPHINS

We must try and make people more informed to make the decision of whether to support these facilities or not. They can only stay in business by popular demand. Do you really want to see more dolphins suffer?

The following illustrates just how dolphins are being maltreated. It is a sad story with a happy ending.

The dolphins of Chennai

Marie Lippens met Horace Dobbs in Bimini in 1997 when they swam with wild dolphins. Earlier this year, Marie was travelling in India, and was disturbed to read in the well known magazine "India Today" that three bottlenose dolphins had died in captivity in India's first marine amusement park near Madras. She investigated further, and discovered that the owners of the park intended to import a further five dolphins as replacements. She immediately contacted Horace and asked him to write to the park's owners and also Mrs Maneka Gandhi, India's Minister of State. This is what he wrote:-

16 February 1999

Dear Mr Pinheiro

International Dolphin Watch is a non profit making organisation founded by myself in 1978 for the study and conservation of wild dolphins.

It has been brought to my attention by a member of our organisation that you are already responsible for the death of 3 dolphins in captivity and yet you propose to import 5 more dolphins to replace them.

International Dolphin Watch has long championed the now growing belief that cetaceans should not be held in captivity. The long term detrimental effect on them is now well documented and accepted. There is no scientific or educational value in keeping dolphins in captivity. The United Kingdom leads the world by having no captive whales or dolphins.

I would strongly urge you to think again before going ahead with your plans. Consider the distress and suffering you will cause these lovely creatures, and also your past track record.

Yours sincerely

Dr H E Dobbs
Honorary Director


16 February 1999

Mrs Maneka Gandhi
Minister of State
Ministry of State for Welfare
Room 202,C Wing
Shastri Bhawan
Gate 6
New Delhi
INDIA

Dear Mrs Gandhi

Dolphin Park
Dolphin Park - Chennai

International Dolphin Watch is a non profit making organisation founded by myself in 1978 for the study and conservation of wild dolphins.

An article that appeared in 'India To-day' magazine documenting the death of 3 captive dolphins at the above-mentioned park was brought to my attention by a member of our organisation.

International Dolphin Watch has long championed the now growing belief that cetaceans should not be held in captivity. The long term detrimental effect on them is now well documented and accepted. There is no scientific or educational value in keeping dolphins in captivity. The United Kingdom leads the world by having no captive whales or dolphins.

My purpose in writing is to ask you to look into this matter, and also the plan to import another 5 dolphins to replace those that died, and who will no doubt suffer a similar fate.

Yours sincerely

Dr H E Dobbs
Honorary Director

On April 12th 1999, the following reply was received from Mrs. Gandhi.

Dear Dr Dobbs,

I am sorry for my late reply as I was out of the country for a month.

I have intervened in the matter since the dolphins that were imported died in the first ever dolphinarium sought to be set up in India. The import into India of all sea animals for the purpose of entertainment has been strictly prohibited both now and in the future.

With Best Wishes

Smt. Maneka Gandhi.

The magazine article referred to above states that "the dolphins were the park's star attraction and huge moneyspinners". There is no doubt whatsoever that had this ban not been imposed, there would have been many more dolphinaria springing up in India. There is a very significant danger that as some third world countries become more affluent as a result of commerce developing on the backs of low cost labour, they will seek to develop leisure and associated industries which they perceive to be successful in the west. Can they be blamed for emulating the likes of Sea World?

International Dolphin Watch will continue to campaign against any organisations that seek to deprive dolphins of their right to total freedom.

YOU CAN HELP BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK

CETFREE campaign - Malta

IDW is pleased to be one of the organisations supporting CETFREE, the Cetacean Freedom Alliance, in Malta.
Cetfree was originally set up to try to safeguard the welfare of 3 captive dolphins imported into Malta for a new dolphinarium. The organisation is dedicated to raising awareness about whales and dolphins through publishing and networking. They campaign against keeping dolphins in captivity and oppose the local and international trade in marine mammals.

Their recent campaign received little media attention despite the eye catching poster.
CETFREE 1.jpg

Cetfree offers educational talks to schools in Malta and next school year

'Dilo and the Witch of Black Rock' will be used as a competition prize.

To contact Cetfree, E-mail ntsec@waldonet.net.mt

 

uparrow_puple.gif

 

BannerL.gif
Banner Help Dolphins.jpg

International Dolphin Watch 10 Melton Road, North Ferriby, E.Yorks HU14 3ET. England.
Tel: +44 (0)1482 632650 Fax: +44 (0)1482 634914 E-mail:
idw@talk21.com